|
Post by birdman on May 9, 2007 2:46:19 GMT -5
And you also said it was impossible NOT to get into panic mode. And I'm not getting lucky. I do the same run and try to improve it everytime. It doesn't matter if these multiple people experience it, I know multiple that don't. The gameplay things you mentioned are directly link to how good you are. It doesn't matter what the features of panic mode are, only that you shouldn't have let it get to that. You're not supposed to be able to do much in panic, if you could it would defeat the purpose of it. And if you just can't stop getting hit or defeat them why not use an item?
|
|
|
Post by PrincessJennifer on May 9, 2007 2:59:41 GMT -5
-.-;
I stated that it was nearly impossible not to and it is. The stalkers show up too often and there are few ways to successfully escape from them. There is also a large, confusing enviroment too. Thus, no matter how good you are, you'll keep ending up in panic mode.
Clock Tower 3 had most of these features, just not as bad. You still had some visibility in panic mode, the killers did not show up as often though still too much, and the levels were easier to navigate.
|
|
|
Post by birdman on May 9, 2007 3:06:59 GMT -5
''I stated that it was nearly impossible not to and it is. The stalkers show up too often and there are few ways to successfully escape from them. There is also a large, confusing enviroment too. Thus, no matter how good you are, you'll keep ending up in panic mode.''
You clearly aren't reading what I'm posting. Right there you just decided how good I and anyone else is at the game. You put everyone one level that you're on. That's ridiculous. Read this part I GO THROUGH THE GAME ALL THE TIME NEVER GETTING PANIC. It is entirely possible not to mention incredibly easy. Why do you think I'm lying? Do want a photo of my total results screen? I think I know where to download a speed run like the ones I do for you to watch. Do I need to do this?
|
|
|
Post by birdman on May 9, 2007 3:10:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by PrincessJennifer on May 9, 2007 4:30:59 GMT -5
You need to watch it, because you are getting more than a little hostile.
I call what you are having extreme luck. Many people have witnessed the flaws I have stated, so they can't not exist. And you think I'm lying, plus also decided how good I am at the game. You said I must be horrible at it, simply because of the flaws you pointed out, but you are wrong. I am quite skilled when it comes to survival-horror games.
|
|
|
Post by Prince Thorn on May 9, 2007 16:12:38 GMT -5
Sorry for interfering but is there really a point in stressing over a game ? Everyone has their own likes and if PJ doesn't like Haunting Ground than thats okay, we don't have to state flaws or anything since we experience different kinds of things when playing games. Seriously, lets just leave it alone.
|
|
|
Post by birdman on May 9, 2007 20:01:58 GMT -5
I'm not stressing at all you know. And why would I need to watch it when I already have? It's not extreme luck since I do it all the time. I have methods of dealing with stalkers and strategies for for getting through each part flawlessly, so I don't get how the gameplay things you mentioned are flaws when there are ways to beat them.
And that extreme luck thing is stupid. That's like saying I'm not good at all and do everything by sheer chance. So when a stalker pops out and I defeat it with ease, I must have avoided its attacks by chance, with the most extreme luck told Hewie to stay to charge his attack power, and with even more luck made the stalker follow me and had had Hewie use his bite attack from behind them. All this by luck? Does anyone see something wrong with that?
|
|
|
Post by PrincessJennifer on May 9, 2007 20:24:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by birdman on May 9, 2007 20:36:05 GMT -5
What exactly did you link to that for?
|
|
|
Post by PrincessJennifer on May 9, 2007 21:11:29 GMT -5
It's another review, from a very respected survival-horror fansite, which points out the same flaws as I found, plus more.
|
|
|
Post by birdman on May 9, 2007 21:19:14 GMT -5
I see a review of someone saying the same stuff, but you mistake actual game flaws, with your own skill. That's why there are people who have no trouble dealing with stalkers, and then people who complain about them. It's the same with fighting games. You don't get better unless you practice and figure things out.
I see this type of thing all the time on quite a few gaming boards. Like people who can't handle the difficulty of DMC and say it sucks with bad mechanics and camera. Yet here I am getting S rank on DMD. It's classic scrub mentality.
I quit this debate. Don't take offense to what I've said it's not an attack on you. I'll keep doing my perfect runs.
|
|
|
Post by PrincessJennifer on May 9, 2007 21:44:28 GMT -5
As I've said, I'm good at this game. That does not mean it does not have the flaws I stated.
|
|
|
Post by birdman on May 9, 2007 21:52:34 GMT -5
Ok, but I've found my own ways around those flaws, so I'll keep using those.
Might as well get back on topic. Sengoku Basara 2 is cool. I find it way better than the DW games. It's similar in that it has multiple enemies onscreen, but it's not 2 player. When I first heard that, I didn't like the idea but SB2 is more of an action game. There's also a ton of things to level up so I'll be playing this for a while. Another thing is there's tons of enemies and no slowdown. I think I managed to make it slow down a couple of time but only for a second. It might be the based on the same engine as Chaos Legion, which if you didn't know used hardware to test how many enemies can appear without slowing down.
|
|
|
Post by missrose17 on May 10, 2007 14:30:36 GMT -5
boy this one is hard because i like so many i would say Silent Hill, Final Fantasies, and Fatal Fame.
|
|
|
Post by PrincessJennifer on May 11, 2007 0:17:37 GMT -5
You've never played any of the Final Fantasy or Fatal Frame games, Minda!
|
|